证据来源
研究来源与证据
显影不是经过效度验证的心理测试。这份书目列出用于界定问题、护栏和局限的研究与标准，并不构成本产品准确性的证明。
论文题名、作者和出版物名称保留原始书目写法。
测量与效度验证
公开题库、测试标准，以及判断不同工具和语言是否在测量同一概念的方法。
测量量表
1992–
International Personality Item Pool: Big-Five Factor Markers
Goldberg, L. R. and the International Personality Item Pool
ipip.ori.org
打开来源测量量表
2017
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2)
Soto, C. J. & John, O. P.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
打开来源数据集
2016–
SAPA Personality Inventory
Revelle, W. et al.
personality-project.org
打开来源专业标准
2014
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
AERA, APA & NCME
American Educational Research Association
打开来源理论或方法框架
1959
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix
Campbell, D. T. & Fiske, D. W.
Psychological Bulletin
打开来源理论或方法框架
2016
Measurement invariance conventions and reporting
Putnick, D. L. & Bornstein, M. H.
Developmental Review
打开来源
关系与伴侣偏好
关于关系质量、回应感、依恋情境、满意度和伴侣偏好的研究与量表。
元分析或多研究综述
2020
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies
Joel, S. et al.
PNAS
打开来源元分析或多研究综述
2014
The predictive validity of ideal partner preferences: A review and meta-analysis
Eastwick, P. W., Luchies, L. B., Finkel, E. J. & Hunt, L. L.
Psychological Bulletin
打开来源元分析或多研究综述
2025
A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference-matching
Eastwick, P. W. et al.
PMC
打开来源测量量表
2011
The Experiences in Close Relationships—Relationship Structures questionnaire
Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M. & Brumbaugh, C. C.
Psychological Assessment
打开来源实证研究
1998
Intimacy as an interpersonal process
Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F. & Pietromonaco, P. R.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
打开来源测量量表
2021
Perceived Responsiveness and Insensitivity scales
Crasta, D., Rogge, R. D. et al.
Psychological Assessment
打开来源测量量表
2007
Couples Satisfaction Index
Funk, J. L. & Rogge, R. D.
Journal of Family Psychology
打开来源测量量表
2004
Measurement of communal strength
Mills, J., Clark, M. S., Ford, T. E. & Johnson, M.
Personal Relationships
打开来源
AI 人格推断
与从对话或访谈推断人格最接近的已发表检验，也包括这类推断仍然薄弱的证据。
价值观、匹配与双人分析
关于跨文化价值观、双人数据方法，以及在声称两个人匹配之前需要满足什么证据标准的研究。
测量量表
2022
Measuring the refined theory of individual values in 49 cultural groups
Schwartz, S. H. & Cieciuch, J.
Assessment
打开来源专著
2006
Dyadic Data Analysis
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A. & Cook, W. L.
Guilford Press
打开来源理论或方法框架
2019
Best practices for testing the predictive validity of ideal partner preference-matching
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J. & Simpson, J. A.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
打开来源
纵向研究与公开数据集
可为未来校准提供基础比例、重复观察或题目级材料的数据集。来源公开不等于本产品已经用它们完成校准。
数据集
2009–2022
How Couples Meet and Stay Together
Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J. & Hausen, S.
Stanford University Libraries
打开来源数据集
2008–
pairfam: German Family Panel
Huinink, J. et al.
paneldata.org
打开来源数据集
2016–2019
Raw data from online personality tests (IPIP-FFM, ECR, HEXACO, FTI)
Open Psychometrics
openpsychometrics.org
打开来源